Harris Pandering During the Presidential Debate
Following last night's 2024 Presidential Debate, it was clear Trump and Harris rarely saw eye to eye on any policy, but something they did agree on was Israel's right to defend itself. Trump was strong on his belief that Israel would cease to exist if Harris became the president, and Trump promises he would promptly put an end to the ongoing conflict. Meanwhile, Harris panders towards supporters of both Israel and Palestine during the debate.
Harris was careful to give both sides, Arab-Americans and Jewish voters, what they wanted to hear during the debate. Harris double downed on her support for Israel and its right to defend itself, but adds that it comes to a certain standard or extent to how they defend itself. Harris defines that their defense is in particular to its relation with Iran and threats Iran poses towards Israel.
Harris later mentions innocent Palestinian lives, around 40 million as stated by fact checkers, who have been slaughtered by Israel. While she defends Israel, she demands a ceasefire as well which contradicts her previous statements. Harris later poses a two-state solution so Gaza can be rebuilt and Palestinians can flourish in their independence.
The Jerusalem Post reminds readers how Israel's brief section of the debate reminds viewers that it appears to be "reduced to a political talking point." This is disheartening considering how many innocent Israeli and Palestinian humans have been killed, and how many hostages from both sides still need to be freed. Harris's plans for Israel and Palestine seem grim and her pandering towards both sides to maintain voters is showing how her policies are lacking substance and refinery.
References
Keinon, H (2024). Apocalyptic predictions and fantasies: Israel's cameo apperance in Harris-Trump debate- analysis. The Jerusalem Post https://www.jpost.com/us-elections/article-819649


Hi Cj! This is a great post that explains the pandering that took place in the 2024 election debate. I watched the debate and after reading your blog, I am realizing that I did not pay enough attention to the pandering that occurred. It is so easy to get wrapped up in the constant arguing in the debate and who's side you are on without fully seeing the depth of the debate techniques. I really like how you mention that Harris contradicted herself when she demanded a ceasefire. I felt as though the debate for Harris was not authentic at all. Most of her policies she spoke on were contradictory to what she has said in the past. Sadly, at the end of the day, it is all about the votes which I think can be a slippery slope when America is at stake. Part of being the President is choosing your battles, but it seems that Harris wants to please both supporters of the Israeli and Palestinians. However, it is important to do what is best for the United States first and then the rest of the world second. Do you agree with that? I am excited to read more of your blog!
ReplyDelete